<< ARI Watch | Ctrl + or – enlarges or reduces text size. |
“The wicked lead understanding astray with mastery. There is a gymnastic of falsehood. A sophist is a forger, and when expedient this forger mangles good sense. A certain logic, very supple, very implacable and very agile, is at the service of evil, and excels in stabbing truth in the dark. ... “Such a sophist, admired by fools, possesses no other glory than having made bruises in human awareness.” — Victor Hugo [1] |
From unsightly public crowds to violent crime to government corruption, immigration is ruining the West. Yet the Ayn Rand Institute promotes unrestricted immigration, even illegal immigration, including from the Third World. Snapshots of ARI’s production on this subject over the years:
“Any restrictions on immigration – large or small – trample the rights of both employers and job-seeking immigrants.”I am not making this up. Addressing those who donated to ARI: This is where part of your money ended up, in La La Land.— Robert Tracinski
Opposition to Immigration is Un-American
ARI Op-Ed January 15, 1999.
“The principle of individual rights demands open immigration. Implementing that would mean phasing out all limitations on immigration. Entry into the United States should ultimately be free for any foreigner, absent objective evidence of criminal intent or infectious disease.”— Harry Binswanger
Anti-Immigration Rhetoric Frighteningly Reveals Education’s Failure
Forbes magazine February 3, 2013
(a reworking of “Immigration Quotas vs. Individual Rights: The Moral and Practical Case for Open Immigration” Capitalism Magazine April 2, 2006).
“The problem of ‘illegal’ immigration can be solved at the stroke of a pen: legalize immigration. ... I admire those who broke our rotten, rights-defying anti-immigration laws to come here.”— Harry Binswanger
The Solution to ‘Illegal Immigration’
Capitalism Magazine May 20, 2006.
“The solution to illegal immigration is to make it legal.”— Yaron Brook
Open Immigration Policy
ARI lecture uploaded to YouTube March 17, 2008.
“The principle of individual rights ... mandates open immigration.”— Craig Biddle
Immigration and Individual Rights
The Objective Standard Spring 2008.
“Imagine if the number of annual immigrants increased ... to, say, five million. Virtually overnight we would see money pour into the American real estate market, as millions of new businessmen and workers bought and rented homes.” [He goes on to say this would “eliminate the oversupply of houses.” Apparently housing doesn’t command a high enough price for Mr. Brook.]— Yaron Brook
Open the Borders, End the Housing Glut
ARI blog December 11, 2008.
“The border between the U.S. and Mexico (and between the U.S. and Canada) should be exactly like the border between Connecticut and Massachusetts: you see ‘Welcome to Massachusetts’ and otherwise you are unaware of the difference.”— Harry Binswanger
Collectivist Arizona Immigration Law Is Anti-Capitalist
Capitalism Magazine April 28, 2012.
“Open immigration is both morally right and economically beneficial. ... If we let enough [immigrants] in, perhaps their number will offset the growing number of the native born who simper that America is the land of entitlement.”— Andrew Bernstein
Open Immigration Will Greatly Slow America’s Rush Toward An Entitlement State
Forbes magazine June 12, 2012.
“... let’s demonstrate the moral confidence, and intellectual rigor, to bid welcome to all; by offering them a proud and rational exposition of our nation’s principles and ideals.” [In other words: Open borders with lecture included.]— Amit Ghate
Does Immigration Actually Threaten American Culture?
Forbes magazine November 12, 2012.
“... open immigration is, for contemporary America, the only policy that is both moral and practical.”— Andrew Bernstein
Objectively Speaking
July 24, 2013 announcement of his first BlogTalk radio show on July 30.
“Ultimately, there should be completely open borders ... But a compromise is acceptable, if it’s a step in the right direction ... .”— Harry Binswanger
Let’s Call The Democrats’ Bluff On Immigration
Forbes magazine December 10, 2013.
“An ‘illegal’ immigrant is, in principle, like a Jew in Nazi Germany who refused to wear the yellow star.”— Harry Binswanger
Amnesty For Illegal Immigrants Is Not Enough, They Deserve An Apology
Forbes magazine March 4, 2013.
When Amy Peikoff interviewed Yaron Brook on the Tammy Bruce radio show June 16, 2013, Mr. Brook spoke in favor of the Rubio-Schumer-McCain-Graham-Durbin-Menendez-Flake-Bennet immigration reform bill – read amnesty / immigration surge bill – then being considered in the U.S. Senate, saying:
On Mr. Brook’s BlogTalkRadio show of June 28, 2016 he imagined all unskilled Mexican migrants being legal:
In “Socialism Loathes the Poor, Capitalism Loves Them” (RealClearMarkets October 21, 2015) Harry Binswanger wrote
Harry Binswanger (in his HBTV podcast of August 9, 2021) regarding migrants coming across the southern border, speaking from his gated whiteopia community outside Naples, Florida:
In a tweet of August 31, ARI quoted Harry Binswanger during OCON 2021:
In a tweet of July 3, 2022, Mr. Binswanger commented on his OCON 2022 lecture “The Case for Open Borders”:
For those concerned about immigration changing our culture, in a tweet of February 20, 2017 Mr. Brook quoted in paraphrase something he had said on February 10 (we leave off our external quote marks): [2]
The title of a video posted June 20, 2019 on Yaron Brook’s YouTube channel: “Too Many Jobs, Not Enough People – Immigration Needed.” Translation: I think workers command too high a wage/salary, therefore we need immigration to lower it.
On November 19, 2021 someone tweeted a video clip of yet another migrant crossing. An “enormous group of several hundred migrants just crossed illegally into Eagle Pass, TX. ... there have already been over 72,000 illegal crossings here in the Del Rio sector since FY’23 began on 10/1, including 1,400+ in last 24 hours alone.” Gregory Salmieri replied on the 21st, emphasis his: “It’s so easy to get in illegally in part *because* it’s so hard to get a work visa.” He goes on to say that the crossing is harmless and they are just “moving somewhere” – your country and maybe neighborhood to be exact, though Salmieri does not recognize the possessive – to get a job. In full: “Whenever harmless things like moving somewhere to get a job are banned there are lots of people who will abet breaking the law, and so doing the thing illegally gets easier.” But of course it is not a harmless thing. He might as well have argued: “It’s so easy to steal an election in part *because* stealing elections is illegal.”
June 21, 2023 ARI published “Rethink the Term ‘Illegal Immigrant’ ” by Agustina Vergara Cid, research associate at ARI, as part of its New Ideal series of editorials. This immigrant from Argentina lectures us:
Soon after that ARI promoted Agustina Vergara Cid to “junior fellow” at ARI, where, as she says, “I write, research, and speak about topics related to the philosophy of immigration.” On September 19, 2023 she tweeted, and Yaron Brook retweeted:
Out of its erstwhile Washington, DC office ARI once regularly hosted what it called “educational briefings” for Congressional staffers. According to ARI’s Impact newsletter of July 2013: “Through these briefings, we introduce congressional aides and assistants to Ayn Rand’s moral principles, we indicate how to apply those ideas to current issues and we stress the real-world impact of approaching policy issues from the framework of Rand’s philosophic thought.” On June 20, 2013, a few days after his Amy Peikoff interview, Yaron Brook gave a briefing on “What Does a Pro-Individual Rights Immigration Policy Look Like?” You can be sure that to him it looked a lot like the Rubio-Schumer amnesty / immigration surge bill then before the Senate.
ARI promoted open immigration in its now moribund undergraduate student newspaper The Undercurrent. [3]
ARI writers include Muslims in open immigration but sometimes say restrictions should be placed on their property rights (see Leonard Peikoff’s podcast of June 28, 2010 about the particular case of erecting a building). ARI’s response to the NSA violating the Fourth Amendment, which the government claims is necessary to catch resident would-be terrorists, is to downplay any concern. In either case, the “reactive statism” – statism intended to fix a problem created by the state – endangers our lives and property rights. We get crushed in a pincer movement: Third World immigrants pushing us on one side, statism pushing us on the other in reaction. Far better – indeed good in itself – is to restrict immigration. This is not statism – contrary to what ARI maintains – it is a proper function of government: protecting the country from invasion.
ARI writers promote both U.S. belligerency on the other side of the earth and immigration at home – invade the world, invite the world. The government uses the problems these policies create to justify setting up a police state. ARI writers refuse to acknowledge either the police state or the connection.
The Boston Marathon bombing dramatically illustrated the evil of open immigration. The hateful Tsarnaev brothers – hateful in acts and looks – who carried out the bombing (apparently among others whom the FBI is protecting), should never have been let into the country, much less given citizenship and welfare checks. Two of the 1993 World Trade Center bombers were in this country because of Reagan’s 1986 farm worker amnesty. Another example: the conspirators in the New York City subway bomb plot – one of the few real terrorist plots as opposed to FBI manufactured ones – were all “naturalized” Third World immigrants, immigrants we could have done without.
9-11 was provoked by U.S. foreign policy and then made easy by unrestricted immigration and visas. End both and we – we authentic Americans – would be safer, freer and more prosperous. Ayn Rand Institute writers blather about saving American lives, and blank out the obvious.
The harm open immigration does to us goes much further than terrorist attacks or even police state measures. Other ARI Watch articles address the problem in more detail.